Measurement
What is measured, and what the employer receives
Aggregated reporting for benefits and occupational-health governance, with a suppression rule that protects small cohorts.
What the program counts
Malewellnesszone reports five measures: participation rate against the declared eligible headcount; the distribution of risk flags raised at screening or assessment; completion of scheduled follow-up; self-reported function scores at week 0 and week 12 of the guided program; and referral conversion, meaning the share of participants for whom the treating clinician issued a specialist or family-physician referral. Each measure is a count or a rate. None of them is a claim that a condition improved, resolved or was cured.
Function scores use the same validated questionnaires administered at enrolment, including IIEF-5 where sexual function is part of the presenting history. Change between week 0 and week 12 is reported only when both scores exist for the same participant and when the resulting cell still meets the suppression threshold. Missing follow-up is reported as incomplete. It is not treated as clinical failure. Referral conversion is reported as a process measure. It does not mean the specialist appointment occurred, because that event sits with the receiving service.
Contents of the reporting pack
The pack contains: eligible headcount and the method used to calculate it; enrolment and completed-assessment counts; screening-day attendance where a day was held; risk-flag distribution in agreed categories (blood pressure, glycaemia, lipids, questionnaire thresholds); follow-up completion at week 4 and week 12; paired function-score change where cells allow; referral counts by destination type; a short narrative of operational issues (booking delays, laboratory outages, postponed on-site days); and a reminder of the suppression rule. Custom fields purchased on Enterprise Mandate are appended as additional tables.
Anonymization is applied before the pack leaves the operational system. Names, employee numbers, email addresses and free-text clinical notes are stripped. Any slice of the data (site, business unit, age band, language) that would leave fewer than ten participants in a cell is withheld or rolled up until the cell is ten or larger. The pack is delivered as a PDF with a one-page board summary slide. It is not a live dashboard and it is not a feed into the employer's HRIS.
Illustrative model, not a client result
Consider a hypothetical 600-employee industrial operator, 420 of whom are male and declared eligible. If communications reach the full eligible group and 28 percent enrol in the first two quarters, the screened population is 118 people. If one quarter of those 118 are flagged for a clinician discussion on blood pressure, lipids or questionnaire thresholds, the flagged group is 30. If two thirds of flagged participants accept the 12-week guided program, follow-up volume is 20 people, which is reportable under the suppression rule. If the remaining flagged group is split across three sites, some site-level cells would be suppressed and only the operator-wide total would appear.
Change the uptake assumption to 15 percent and the screened population falls to 63, with a flagged group of about 16 and a follow-up group that may sit near the suppression boundary once sliced by site. These figures are planning illustrations only. Individual results vary. They are offered so that a benefits lead can size licence tier, included assessments and on-site days against a plausible first-year calendar, using arithmetic that can be rebuilt from the assumptions on the page.
Why this site does not show client results
Participant confidentiality is the first reason. Even a well-anonymized story about a named industry and a round percentage can be enough, in a small Canadian labour market, to identify a cohort. The second reason is the limit of self-reported data. Function scores and questionnaires are useful operational measures. They are not equivalent to independently audited clinical endpoints, and they should not be presented to a board as proof that a disease burden fell.
Industry-wide benchmarks for men's sexual-health program uptake in Canadian workplaces are thin, which is itself a reason this service exists. Where Malewellnesszone cites a percentage on this page, it is labelled as an assumption in an illustrative model. Procurement teams that need a comparison are invited to use the published fees, the service levels on the method page, and the suppression rule, rather than a testimonial the organization would not be in a position to verify.
How reporting feeds the benefits cycle
Quarterly packs land within 15 business days of quarter end. For an organization whose benefits renewal sits in the autumn, the second-quarter pack is usually the last complete picture that can be included in a broker or insurer submission. The board summary slide is written in operational language: eligible population, uptake, flags, follow-up, referrals, issues. It is suitable for a Total Rewards committee. It is not suitable as an advertising claim about vitality, potency or reduced claims cost.
Internal presentations should keep the suppression rule visible and should avoid extrapolating from a single quarter. They should not attribute avoided hospitalizations or premium relief to the program. Those attributions require actuarial work that Malewellnesszone does not perform. What the pack can support is a decision to renew, to adjust on-site days, to add a province, or to move from Core Readiness to Integrated Care because included assessment volume is being used. See the fee schedule for how those choices are priced.