Why men's sexual health belongs in occupational health, not only in EAP
Employee assistance programs remain the default place where Canadian employers park conversations about erectile difficulty, low energy and related distress. Utilization data then show that men in the 35 to 60 bracket rarely call. The pattern is expected: EAP is framed as counselling, often after a crisis, and it is not connected to blood pressure, lipids, sleep or a laboratory panel. Sexual function complaints in this age group frequently sit on the same risk cluster as cardiometabolic disease. Treating the topic solely as a counselling matter leaves the occupational-health picture incomplete.
Occupational health already measures hearing, respiratory function, fitness for certain roles and, in some sectors, fatigue. Adding a confidential vitality pathway does not require the employer to collect sexual-function scores. It requires a contracted service that can take the history, order the panel and report only aggregated flags. The benefits team then has a line item it can administer, a reporting pack it can file at renewal, and a communications kit that tells employees the conversation will not reach a manager. EAP can remain available for counselling. The two services answer different questions, and procurement should describe them that way in the benefits booklet rather than folding men's health into a single "wellness" heading that nobody can audit.